New York Department of Health Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program

NYS DSRIP PPS Final Scores and Recommendations: Advocate Community Providers

March 13, 2015

Advocate Community Providers (AW Medical)

Organizational Component Scores

9.23
# Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 Executive Summary Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
2 Governance 23.95 25 1.00 24.95
3 Community Needs Assessment 24.17 25   24.17
5 Workforce Strategy 15.75 16 0.25 16.00
6 Data Sharing, Confidentiality
& Rapid Cycle Evaluation		 4.72 5   4.72
7 PPS Cultural Competency/
Health Literacy		 15.00 15   15.00
8 DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
9 Financial Sustainability Plan 10   9.23
  Final Organizational
Subjective Score		 92.82 96.00 1.25 94.07

Individual Project Scores

#           Project             IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 2.a.i 38.33 40   38.33
2 2.a.iii 18.93 20   18.93
3 2.b.iii 20.00 20   20.00
4 2.b.iv 18.67 20 1.00 19.67
5 3.a.ii 20.00 20   20.00
6 3.b.i 19.47 20   19.47
7 3.c.i 20.00 20   20.00
8 3.d.iii 19.33 20   19.33
9 4.b.i 100.00 100   100.00
10 4.b.ii 100.00 100   100.00

Bonus Points

Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
2.a.i IDS Bonus 3.00 3   3.00
Workforce Strategy Bonus 1.33 3 1.67 3.00

State of New York
Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
PPS Project Application Score Modifications from DSRIP
Project Approval and Oversight Panel

PPS: Advocate Community Providers (AW Medical)

Project/Application Component: Workforce Bonus

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased the Workforce Bonus subjective scoring by 1.67 points from 1.33 to 3 points.

Explanation: The Panel felt there was sufficient evidence that the PPS did engage a proven workforce healthcare vendor and therefore should be awarded the full available bonus points instead of partial points. The language only indicated the PPS intended to contract with a proven workforce vendor and as a result only partial points were initially awarded by the IA.

Project/Application Component: Governance

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased the Governance subjective scoring by 1 point from 23.95 to 24.95.

Explanation: The Panel was impressed with the organizational structure of the PPS and wanted to give special consideration to the intricacies of the PPS.

Project/Application Component: Project 2.b.iv

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased project 2.b.iv subjective scoring by 1 point from 18.67 to 19.67.

Explanation: The Panel was impressed with the innovative methods to enhance discharge planning to achieve better outcomes and reduce 30 day readmissions for chronic health conditions.

Project/Application Component: Workforce

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased the Workforce subjective scoring by .25 points from 15.75 to 16.

Explanation: The Panel indicated due to the significant investment in workforce funding and the identification of a proven workforce vendor, any deficiencies identified in the response of the application did not warrant any point reduction.

New York State Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
DSRIP Project Plan Application Scoring

Organizational and Project Scoring Summary Tables

Organizational Component Scores

Please note, the organizational component score is worth 30% of the final application score.

Section Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Score Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Section Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Workforce Score
Executive Summary Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Governance 25 24.13 23.96 23.31 23.33 20.21 25.00 23.65 23.32 23.95 23.95 N/A 1.00 24.95
Community Needs Assessment 25 24.86 25.00 24.58 23.75 23.06 22.78 24.17 24.00 24.00 24.17 N/A   24.17
Workforce Strategy 20 15.55 16.00 16.00 15.38 13.62 15.83 15.69 15.40 15.75 15.75 4.00 0.25 20.00
Data Sharing, Confidentiality & Rapid Cycle Evaluation 5 4.72 4.72 4.72 4.44 4.33 5.00 4.72 4.66 4.66 4.72 N/A   4.72
PPS Cultural Competency/Health Literacy 15 15.00 15.00 15.00 14.17 15.00 15.00 15.00 14.86 15.00 15.00 N/A   15.00
DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Financial Sustainability Plan 10 10.00 8.89 8.52 9.44 8.52 10.00 9.17 9.23 9.23 9.23 N/A   9.23
Total 98.07

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Project Scores

Please note, the project scores are worth 70% of the final application score.

Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Scores Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Project # Subjective Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Scale Score Speed Score
2.a.i 40 38.33 40.00 36.67 36.67 38.33 40.00 38.33 38.33 38.33 38.33 12.47 32.50   83.31
2.a.iii 20 18.67 20.00 17.33 18.67 14.67 20.00 18.67 18.22 18.93 18.93 29.55 37.50   85.98
2.b.iii 20 17.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 17.33 20.00 20.00 19.11 19.11 20.00 23.36 33.75   77.11
2.b.iv 20 17.33 20.00 18.67 18.67 17.33 20.00 18.67 18.67 18.67 18.67 28.35 38.33 1.00 86.35
3.a.i 20 17.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 17.33 20.00 20.00 19.11 19.11 20.00 27.49 37.50   84.99
3.b.i 20 18.67 20.00 20.00 18.67 14.67 20.00 19.33 18.67 19.47 19.47 33.09 34.58   87.14
3.c.i 20 17.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 18.89 19.47 20.00 33.97 37.50   91.47
3.d.iii 20 20.00 20.00 18.33 18.33 13.33 20.00 19.17 18.33 19.33 19.33 33.95 36.67   89.95
4.b.i 100 88.89 100.00 94.44 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.22 98.89 100.00       100.00
4.b.ii 100 88.89 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.15 100.00 100.00       100.00

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Final Application Score Calculation

Please note the final application score is comprised of 30% Organizational Score + 70% Project Score + Bonuses

Project # Organizational Score Weighted Organizational Score 30% Project Score Weighted Project Score 70% Bonus (2.a.i IDS) Bonus (Workforce) Bonus (2.d.i Project) Panel Adjustment Final Application Score
2.a.i 98.07 29.42 83.31 58.32 3.00 1.33 TBD 1.67 93.74
2.a.iii 98.07 29.42 85.98 60.19 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 92.61
2.b.iii 98.07 29.42 77.11 53.98 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 86.40
2.b.iv 98.07 29.42 86.35 60.45 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 92.87
3.a.i 98.07 29.42 84.99 59.49 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 91.92
3.b.i 98.07 29.42 87.14 61.00 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 93.42
3.c.i 98.07 29.42 91.47 64.03 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 96.45
3.d.iii 98.07 29.42 89.95 62.97 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 95.39
4.b.i 98.07 29.42 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 100.00
4.b.ii 98.07 29.42 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 100.00