New York Department of Health Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program

NYS DSRIP PPS Final Scores and Recommendations: Millennium Collaborative Care PPS (ECMC)

March 13, 2015

Millennium Collaborative Care PPS (ECMC)

Organizational Component Scores

# Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 Executive Summary Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
2 Governance 24.49 25   24.49
3 Community Needs Assessment 24.79 25   24.79
5 Workforce Strategy 16.00 16   16.00
6 Data Sharing, Confidentiality
& Rapid Cycle Evaluation		 4.86 5   4.86
7 PPS Cultural Competency/
Health Literacy		 14.17 15   14.17
8 DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
9 Financial Sustainability Plan 8.89 10   8.89
  Final Organizational
Subjective Score		 93.29 96.00 0.00 93.29

Individual Project Scores

#           Project             IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 2.a.i 40.00 40   40.00
2 2.b.iii 20.00 20   20.00
3 2.b.vii 20.00 20   20.00
4 2.b.viii 20.00 20   20.00
5 2.d.i 20.00 20   20.00
6 3.a.i 20.00 20   20.00
7 3.a.ii 19.33 20   19.33
8 3.b.i 20.00 20   20.00
9 3.f.i 20.00 20   20.00
10 4.a.i 100.00 100   100.00
11 4.d.i 100.00 100   100.00

Bonus Points

Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
2.a.i IDS Bonus 3.00 3   3.00
Workforce Strategy Bonus 1.00 3   1.00

State of New York
Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
PPS Project Application Score Modifications from DSRIP
Project Approval and Oversight Panel

PPS: Millennium Collaborative Care PPS (ECMC)

Project/Application Component: Overall Subjective Scoring of the PPS Application

Panel Action Taken: The Panel made no modifications to the PPS Application score

Explanation: After a presentation by the IA for each PPS, the Panel deliberated the merits of the organizational and project subjective scores. The Panel accepted the scores recommended by the Independent Assessor.

New York State Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
DSRIP Project Plan Application Scoring

Organizational and Project Scoring Summary Tables

Organizational Component Scores

Please note, the organizational component score is worth 30% of the final application score.

Section Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Score Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Section Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Workforce Score
Executive Summary Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Governance 25 23.75 24.69 24.50 24.48 20.96 25.00 24.49 23.90 24.48 24.49 N/A   24.49
Community Needs Assessment 25 25.00 25.00 24.58 23.96 25.00 22.92 24.79 24.41 24.71 24.79 N/A   24.79
Workforce Strategy 20 16.00 16.00 16.00 15.22 14.43 16.00 16.00 15.61 15.84 16.00 2.00   18.00
Data Sharing, Confidentiality & Rapid Cycle Evaluation 5 5.00 4.72 3.94 5.00 4.33 5.00 4.86 4.67 4.81 4.86 N/A   4.86
PPS Cultural Competency/Health Literacy 15 15.00 13.33 15.00 12.50 12.50 15.00 14.17 13.89 13.89 14.17 N/A   14.17
DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Financial Sustainability Plan 10 10.00 7.96 7.59 9.44 8.52 9.44 8.98 8.83 8.83 8.98 N/A   8.98
Total 95.29

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Project Scores

Please note, the project scores are worth 70% of the final application score.

Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Scores Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Project # Subjective Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Scale Score Speed Score
2.a.i 40 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 16.35 30.00   86.35
2.b.iii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.67 18.67 20.00 20.00 19.56 19.56 20.00 27.02 33.14   80.16
2.b.vii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 29.59 37.50   87.09
2.b.viii 20 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 18.89 19.67 20.00 29.60 36.00   85.60
2.d.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.67 20.00 20.00 19.44 20.00 20.00 30.00 36.00   86.00
3.a.i 20 20.00 20.00 18.67 20.00 14.67 20.00 20.00 18.89 19.73 20.00 26.28 36.07   82.35
3.a.ii 20 17.33 20.00 18.67 20.00 16.00 20.00 19.33 18.67 19.20 19.33 31.23 33.50   84.06
3.b.i 20 17.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 18.89 19.47 20.00 28.41 32.50   80.91
3.f.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.67 20.00 20.00 19.78 20.00 20.00 31.64 38.33   89.97
4.a.i 100 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 88.89 100.00 100.00 98.15 100.00 100.00       100.00
4.d.i 100 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 96.67 100.00 100.00       100.00

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Final Application Score Calculation

Please note the final application score is comprised of 30% Organizational Score + 70% Project Score + Bonuses

Project # Organizational Score Weighted Organizational Score 30% Project Score Weighted Project Score 70% Bonus (2.a.i IDS) Bonus (Workforce) Bonus (2.d.i Project) Panel Adjustment Final Application Score
2.a.i 95.29 28.59 86.35 60.45 3.00 1.00 TBD   93.03
2.b.iii 95.29 28.59 80.16 56.11 N/A 1.00 TBD   85.70
2.b.vii 95.29 28.59 87.09 60.96 N/A 1.00 TBD   90.55
2.b.viii 95.29 28.59 85.60 59.92 N/A 1.00 TBD   89.51
2.d.i 95.29 28.59 86.00 60.20 N/A 1.00 TBD   89.79
3.a.i 95.29 28.59 82.35 57.65 N/A 1.00 TBD   87.24
3.a.ii 95.29 28.59 84.06 58.84 N/A 1.00 TBD   88.43
3.b.i 95.29 28.59 80.91 56.64 N/A 1.00 TBD   86.23
3.f.i 95.29 28.59 89.97 62.98 N/A 1.00 TBD   92.57
4.a.i 95.29 28.59 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.00 TBD   99.59
4.d.i 95.29 28.59 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.00 TBD   99.59