New York Department of Health Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program

NYS DSRIP PPS Final Scores and Recommendations: Nassau Queens PPS

March 13, 2015

Nassau Queens PPS

Organizational Component Scores

# Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 Executive Summary Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
2 Governance 23.88 25   23.88
3 Community Needs Assessment 24.24 25   24.25
5 Workforce Strategy 15.79 16   15.79
6 Data Sharing, Confidentiality
& Rapid Cycle Evaluation		 5.00 5   5.00
7 PPS Cultural Competency/
Health Literacy		 15.00 15   15.00
8 DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
9 Financial Sustainability Plan 8.98 10   8.98
  Final Organizational
Subjective Score		 92.90 96.00 0.00 92.90

Individual Project Scores

#           Project             IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 2.a.i 34.67 40   34.67
2 2.b.ii 20.00 20   20.00
3 2.b.iv 16.67 20   16.67
4 2.b.vii 16.89 20   16.89
5 2.d.i 18.67 20   18.67
6 3.a.i 18.00 20   18.00
7 3.a.ii 20.00 20   20.00
8 3.b.i 18.67 20   18.67
9 3.c.i 18.67 20   18.67
10 4.a.iii 93.52 100   93.52
11 4.b.i 97.22 100   97.22

Bonus Points

Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded		 Total Possible
Subjective
Points		 Panel
Modifications		 Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
2.a.i IDS Bonus 3.00 3   3.00
Workforce Strategy Bonus 1.33 3 1.67 3.00

State of New York
Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
PPS Project Application Score Modifications from DSRIP
Project Approval and Oversight Panel

PPS: Nassau Queens PPS

Project/Application Component: Workforce Bonus

Panel Action Taken: The Panel increased the Workforce Bonus subjective scoring by 1.67 points from 1.33 to 3 points.

Explanation: The Panel felt there was sufficient evidence that the PPS did engage a proven workforce healthcare vendor and therefore should be awarded the full available bonus points instead of partial points. The language only indicated the PPS intended to contract with a proven workforce vendor and as a result only partial points were initially awarded by the IA.

New York State Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
DSRIP Project Plan Application Scoring

Organizational and Project Scoring Summary Tables

Organizational Component Scores

Please note, the organizational component score is worth 30% of the final application score.

Section Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Score Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Section Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Workforce Score
Executive Summary Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Governance 25 23.08 23.19 24.50 24.17 23.33 25.00 23.75 23.88 23.88 23.88 N/A   23.88
Community Needs Assessment 25 25.00 24.58 24.17 23.33 24.17 22.50 24.17 23.96 24.25 24.25 N/A   24.25
Workforce Strategy 20 16.00 15.58 16.00 15.38 15.55 16.00 15.79 15.75 15.75 15.79 4.00   19.79
Data Sharing, Confidentiality & Rapid Cycle Evaluation 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.83 5.00 5.00 4.97 5.00 5.00 N/A   5.00
PPS Cultural Competency/Health Literacy 15 13.33 15.00 15.00 15.00 11.67 15.00 15.00 14.17 14.67 15.00 N/A   15.00
DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Financial Sustainability Plan 10 10.00 8.89 7.59 9.07 6.85 10.00 8.98 8.73 8.73 8.98 N/A   8.98
Total 96.90

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Project Scores

Please note, the project scores are worth 70% of the final application score.

Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Scores Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Project # Subjective Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Scale Score Speed Score
2.a.i 40 25.00 33.33 35.00 35.00 30.00 40.00 34.17 33.06 34.67 34.67 15.60 32.50   82.76
2.b.ii 20 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 40.00 40.00   100.00
2.b.iv 20 16.00 16.00 18.67 20.00 13.33 16.00 16.00 16.67 16.67 16.67 29.53 33.75   79.94
2.b.vii 20 16.00 16.00 18.67 20.00 14.67 16.00 16.00 16.89 16.27 16.89 33.91 33.75   84.55
2.d.i 20 16.00 20.00 20.00 18.67 14.67 18.67 18.67 18.00 18.67 18.67 30.00 35.00   83.67
3.a.i 20 16.00 20.00 16.00 20.00 13.33 20.00 18.00 17.56 17.56 18.00 25.63 35.00   78.63
3.a.ii 20 20.00 20.00 16.67 20.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 18.61 19.33 20.00 28.56 35.00   83.56
3.b.i 20 16.00 20.00 17.33 20.00 14.67 20.00 18.67 18.00 18.00 18.67 24.80 32.50   75.97
3.c.i 20 16.00 20.00 17.33 20.00 13.33 20.00 18.67 17.78 18.67 18.67 31.58 35.00   85.24
4.a.iii 100 88.89 100.00 88.89 94.44 88.89 100.00 91.67 93.52 93.52 93.52       93.52
4.b.i 100 83.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 72.22 94.44 97.22 91.67 95.56 97.22       97.22

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Final Application Score Calculation

Please note the final application score is comprised of 30% Organizational Score + 70% Project Score + Bonuses

Project # Organizational Score Weighted Organizational Score 30% Project Score Weighted Project Score 70% Bonus (2.a.i IDS) Bonus (Workforce) Bonus (2.d.i Project) Panel Adjustment Final Application Score
2.a.i 96.90 29.07 82.76 57.94 3.00 1.33 TBD 1.67 93.01
2.b.ii 96.90 29.07 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 100.00
2.b.iv 96.90 29.07 79.94 55.96 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 88.03
2.b.vii 96.90 29.07 84.55 59.18 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 91.26
2.d.i 96.90 29.07 83.67 58.57 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 90.64
3.a.i 96.90 29.07 78.63 55.04 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 87.11
3.a.ii 96.90 29.07 83.56 58.49 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 90.56
3.b.i 96.90 29.07 75.97 53.18 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 85.25
3.c.i 96.90 29.07 85.24 59.67 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 91.74
4.a.iii 96.90 29.07 93.52 65.46 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 97.54
4.b.i 96.90 29.07 97.22 68.06 N/A 1.33 TBD 1.67 100.00