New York Department of Health Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program

NYS DSRIP PPS Final Scores and Recommendations: Stony Brook University Hospital

March 13, 2015


Stony Brook University Hospital

Organizational Component Scores

# Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded
Total Possible
Subjective
Points
Panel
Modifications
Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 Executive Summary Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
2 Governance 24.35 25   24.35
3 Community Needs Assessment 24.72 25   24.72
5 Workforce Strategy 15.80 16   15.80
6 Data Sharing, Confidentiality
& Rapid Cycle Evaluation
5.00 5   5.00
7 PPS Cultural Competency/
Health Literacy
15.00 15   15.00
8 DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass Pass/Fail N/A Pass
9 Financial Sustainability Plan 9.63 10   9.63
  Final Organizational
Subjective Score
94.49 96.00 0.00 94.49

Individual Project Scores

#           Project             IA Subjective
Points
Awarded
Total Possible
Subjective
Points
Panel
Modifications
Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
1 2.a.i 40.00 40   40.00
2 2.b.iv 20.00 20   20.00
3 2.b.ix 20.00 20   20.00
4 2.b.vii 20.00 20   20.00
5 2.d.i 20.00 20   20.00
6 3.a.i 20.00 20   20.00
7 3.b.i 20.00 20   20.00
8 3.c.i 20.00 20   20.00
9 3.d.ii 20.00 20   20.00
10 4.a.ii 100.00 100   100.00
11 4.b.ii 100.00 100   100.00

Bonus Points

Section IA Subjective
Points
Awarded
Total Possible
Subjective
Points
Panel
Modifications
Final
Subjective
Points
Awarded
2.a.i IDS Bonus 3.00 3   3.00
Workforce Strategy Bonus 1.00 3   3.00


State of New York
Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
PPS Project Application Score Modifications from DSRIP
Project Approval and Oversight Panel


PPS: Stony Brook University Hospital

Project/Application Component: Overall Subjective Scoring of the PPS Application

Panel Action Taken: The Panel made no modifications to the PPS Application score

Explanation: After a presentation by the IA for each PPS, the Panel deliberated the merits of the organizational and project subjective scores. The Panel accepted the scores recommended by the Independent Assessor. The score was approved contingent upon execution, subject to approval by the PPS Board, of a pending partnership agreement with Catholic Health Services.


New York State Department of Health
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program
DSRIP Project Plan Application Scoring

Organizational and Project Scoring Summary Tables

Organizational Component Scores

Please note, the organizational component score is worth 30% of the final application score.

Section Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Score Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Section Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Workforce Score
Executive Summary Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Governance 25 23.63 24.44 23.88 24.79 21.96 25.00 24.16 23.95 24.35 24.35 N/A   24.35
Community Needs Assessment 25 25.00 24.72 25.00 24.17 24.72 23.33 24.72 24.49 24.72 24.72 N/A   24.72
Workforce Strategy 20 16.00 15.43 16.00 15.55 14.85 16.00 15.78 15.64 15.80 15.80 2.67   18.46
Data Sharing, Confidentiality & Rapid Cycle Evaluation 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.33 5.00 5.00 4.89 5.00 5.00 N/A   5.00
PPS Cultural Competency/Health Literacy 15 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 14.17 15.00 15.00 14.86 15.00 15.00 N/A   15.00
DSRIP Budget & Flow of Funds Pass/Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A   Pass
Financial Sustainability Plan 10 9.63 9.44 9.44 10.00 9.26 10.00 9.54 9.63 9.63 9.63 N/A   9.63
Total 97.16

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Project Scores

Please note, the project scores are worth 70% of the final application score.

Points Possible Reviewer Scores Subjective Scores Objective Scores Panel Adjustment Final Adjusted Score
Project # Subjective Points Possible 1 2 3 4 5 6 Median Average Trimmed Average Selected Subjective Score1 Scale Score Speed Score
2.a.i 40 40.00 40.00 37.78 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 39.63 40.00 40.00 15.05 32.50   87.55
2.b.iv 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 16.67 20.00 20.00 19.44 20.00 20.00 34.47 38.33   92.81
2.b.vii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 19.17 20.00 20.00 30.89 38.33   89.23
2.b.ix 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 39.79 37.50   97.29
2.d.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 33.33 32.67   86.00
3.a.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 29.14 33.50   82.64
3.b.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 28.51 31.25   79.76
3.c.i 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 31.06 35.00   86.06
3.d.ii 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 18.33 20.00 20.00 19.72 20.00 20.00 31.85 37.50   89.35
4.a.ii 100 93.33 100.00 100.00 93.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.78 97.78 100.00       100.00
4.b.ii 100 93.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 98.89 100.00 100.00       100.00

_________________________________________

1. Selected Subjective Score is the highest of the median, average, and trimmed average1


Final Application Score Calculation

Please note the final application score is comprised of 30% Organizational Score + 70% Project Score + Bonuses

Project # Organizational Score Weighted Organizational Score 30% Project Score Weighted Project Score 70% Bonus (2.a.i IDS) Bonus (Workforce) Bonus (2.d.i Project) Panel Adjustment Final Application Score
2.a.i 97.16 29.15 87.55 61.29 3.00 1.00 TBD   94.44
2.b.iv 97.16 29.15 92.81 64.96 N/A 1.00 TBD   95.11
2.b.vii 97.16 29.15 89.23 62.46 N/A 1.00 TBD   92.61
2.b.ix 97.16 29.15 97.29 68.10 N/A 1.00 TBD   98.25
2.d.i 97.16 29.15 86.00 60.20 N/A 1.00 TBD   90.35
3.a.i 97.16 29.15 82.64 57.85 N/A 1.00 TBD   87.99
3.b.i 97.16 29.15 79.76 55.83 N/A 1.00 TBD   85.98
3.c.i 97.16 29.15 86.06 60.24 N/A 1.00 TBD   90.39
3.d.ii 97.16 29.15 89.35 62.54 N/A 1.00 TBD   92.69
4.a.ii 97.16 29.15 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.00 TBD   100.00
4.b.ii 97.16 29.15 100.00 70.00 N/A 1.00 TBD   100.00