Workshop A. Cultural Competency and Health Literacy Training (CC/HL) Strategies
  Subject Matter Expert:  Don Kao, Project Reach | 
	This workshop was designed to help identify strategies to address needs related to CCHL training strategies, including:
	   
	   	- Strategies for deploying CCHL training as well as workforce recruitment and managing training issues
 
		- Discussions of how to engage Community Based Organization (CBO) partnerships and funding concerns
 
	     | 
	Key Takeaways:
	   
	   	- Strategies to encourage CBOs and physicians to take part/buy-in to DSRIP efforts
		
			- Tracking/submitting/evaluating CC/HL trainings
 
			- Incentive payments/stipends for providers and CME credits
 
			- CBOs helped with training strategy, design, and implementation
 
			- Train-the-trainer opportunities, where communities select their trainers
 
		  
		- Process for designing training materials
		
			- Domains including: projects (such as asthma); types of providers (such as EMTs, pediatricians, etc.); communities (such as aging, LGBTQ, Latino, etc.)
 
			- Identifying beneficiaries who are willing to weigh in on current gaps
 
                  
		- Health literacy
		
			- Defining issues around language vs. health literacy
 
			- Wrapping health literacy into cultural competency training milestone
 
			- Possible strategies: teach-back, motivational interviews, tools for screenings, build language access into budget, and training for bilingual doctors
 
                  
            Action Items:
		
			- DOH: Project 2.d.i: Spanish version of the PAM tool has errors (other languages as well possibly); need to work with Insignia to ensure a correct version is published and circulated
 
			- PPS: Can offer supplemental CCHL training and stipend payments for CBO attendance at trainings
 
			- PPS: Recommendations that PPS evaluate effectiveness of trainings (e.g., pre/post testing); have CCHL "champions" at each organization/site; pull H-CAHPS questions; and incorporate trainings into clinical rounds
 
                  | 
	Workshop B. Strategies for deploying the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model across the PPS
  Subject Matter Expert: Michelle Casey , Primary Care Development Corporation | 
	This session was focused on strategies for coordinating PCMH & Advanced Primary Care (APC) model across PPS networks, including focused conversations on:
	
		- Identification of solutions to challenges with PCMH certification, such as standards, meeting requirements for care coordination, and training
 
		- Approaches to effectively engaging PPS partners
 
	  | 
	Key Takeaways:
	
		- PPS need guidance/ clarification on practice transformation initiatives including:
		
			- DSRIP PCMH
 
			- APC/SIM
 
			- TCPI
 
			- CPC+
 
                  
		- Discussion of whether it makes sense to remove practices from a PPS network in the event the practices are not interested in pursuing PCMH certification
 
		- Health Information Exchange advancements that will support care coordination – making sure to build systems that will support functionality required for PCMH  Action Items:
 
         Action Items:
		
			- DOH: Identify which PCMH certifications are eligible for "other organizations," (particularly Planned Parenthood); DOH´s Doug Fish to raise with NCQA this month
 
			- PCG: To send link to December 2015 FAQs on APC to participants/ include with posted materials
 
                  | 
	Workshop C. How to roll out effective Health Information Technology (HIT) management to PPS partners
  Subject Matter Experts: Brett Johnson, Elizabeth Amato, and Roy Gomes , New York eHealth Collaborative | 
	This session explored effective Regional Health Information Organization ( RHIO) integration strategies, efforts to standardize HIT across PPS and how to facilitate data sharing across diverse partners. Specific topics for conversation included:
	
		- Managing HIT roll-out across PPS, including strategies for deploying technology to PPS partners who are still operating in a manual environment
 
		- Training and use of RHIOs
 
		- Working with the local RHIO, Health Information Exchange (HIE), Data Warehouse to ensure the functionality needed for DSRIP success
 
	  | 
	Key Takeaways:
	
		- Assessment of HIT capabilities across PPS partners
		
			- Various modalities can be used to assess HIT capabilities of their partners; information on PPS partners has been used to stratify providers and develop data dictionaries to define elements needed to support data exchange
 
                  
		- Leveraging data exchange incentive programs and RHIO functionality to support DSRIP goals
		
			- Lack of awareness of eligibility requirements for data exchange incentive programs
 
			- RHIOs can offer some of the functionality needed by PPS but functionality around real-time data analytics is lacking
 
			- Recommendation that each PPS meet with local RHIO to understand core set of services
 
                  
		- Managing relationships with EMR vendors
		
			- PPS experiencing challenges negotiating with EMR vendors on price and data capabilities to support HIE
 
			- DOH to complete listening tours this summer with PPS to hear more about current HIT/HIE challenges and other ways DOH can help.
 
                  
		- Coordinating effective sharing/use of care plan data
		
			- PPS are eager to have current consent rules revised–developing position statement that can be discussed with DOH; some regions pursuing community consent pilots
 
			- GNYHA working with downstate PPS and ONC to develop minimum data set to support care plan data sharing across care team members; to be piloted with 3-4 siteslate to be piloted with 3- 4 sites this summer – learnings to be shared as available
 
                  
         Action Items:
		
			- DOH: To coordinate pre-meeting with CIO workgroup to prep for/define agenda for meeting with EMR vendors on behalf of PPS to discuss issues including prioritized HIE data elements
 
			- DOH: To work with CIO group to identify how/where to catalogue best practices around HIT/HIE
 
			- PPS: To work with compliance/IT workgroups and HANYS to develop position statement regarding issues with current consent barriers and business case for proposed changes to consent rules; DOH to discuss statement with broader NY state regulators
 
			- NYeC: To share information regarding data exchange incentive programs
 
	 		- GNYHA: To share drafted care plan protocols/data elements and learnings from pilots in summer
 
		  | 
	Workshop D. Funds Flow and Financial Modeling
  Subject Matter Expert: Meggan Schilkie, Health Management Associates | 
	This session was focused on solutions to complexities of their specific partnership/financial structures.  Discussion focused on:
	
		- Strategies for establishing effective processes for funds flow with partners
 
		- Methodologies for financially incentivizing providers and CBOs and approaches that have been most effective to date
 
		- Creative solutions to complex funds flow restrictions
 
	  | 
	Key Takeaways:
	
		- Goals and principles underpinning successful PPS funds flow models
		
			- Reward achievement of DSRIP and meaningful contribution to project outcomes
 
			- Transitioning partners to VBP, creating pathway to sustainability, & transparency/communication
 
			- Balancing risk across partners and being sensitive to the fiscal realities of providers and partners
 
			- Reward collaboration and building partnerships
 
                  
		- High level funds flow model structure
		
			- Most PPS use a phased approach: focus on upfront infrastructure and engagement set up with a second phase focused on meeting performance measures and building partnerships
 
			- Allocating funds flow based on attributable lives, claims experience, and size (for non-billable Medicaid providers); internal to this is a drive to balance funding across projects (some are easier to hit targets while others are much more difficult - so funding can be skewed a bit)
 
                  
		- Managing partner relationships
		
			- Communication with partners: Transparency is key - inclusive process during methodology development, posting overall funds flow publicly, listening sessions with partners to get feedback
 
			- Focusing on sustainability of partners: some PPS compensate for projected revenue loss, others have instead focused on long-term sustainability over short-term financial risks
 
			- Tracking performance: Still an area for development - data sources continue to be an ongoing issue with tracking and no centralized solution, one PPS has a compliance officer, another has set up a partner reporting portal to collect data and project information
 
                  
            Action Items:
		
			- DOH: Look to expand transparency of funds flow process by publicly posting more information re: methodology, payment, etc.
 
			- PPS: Strategies for engaging and contracting with CBOs: direct contract with lead entity; subcontract via safety-net partners; in-kind contributions (e.g., around HIT and data); workforce investments (e.g., training to build VBP capacity); and innovation grants
 
			- PPS: Explore CFO listening tours to engage with CBOs for VBP readiness and begin to understand the roadmap forward; focus on health home engagement strategies
 
			- PPS: Leverage / adopt the Ellenville model - focus on smaller group providers and identify processes that could be improved to drive performance metrics
 
	 		- PPS: Ensure that sustainability principles are baked into funds flow methodology
 
			- PPS: Identifying what type of contracting entity should represent the pathway forward for contracting for VBP
 
		  | 
 
Follow Us